<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
<meta name="generator" content="pandoc" />
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">code{white-space: pre;}</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi again,</p>
<p>On 2017-01-23 15:58, Filip Roséen wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<pre><code> + uint8_t buffer[ 8096 ];</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre><code> Any reason for this value?</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre><code> Other than being `2^N` and a reasonable size in terms of buffering,
not really. Do you have some other buffer size in mind?</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<p>I just got an email from <em>Nick Briggs</em> that noted that <code>8096</code> of course isn’t <code>2^N</code>, the value should be <code>8192</code> for the reasoning to make sense.</p>
<p>I honestly did not notice the typo related to <code>4096</code> and <code>8192</code>, though I will reply with a revised patch shortly (that includes the necessary change in question).</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Filip Roséen</p>
</body>
</html>