<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
<meta name="generator" content="pandoc" />
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">code{white-space: pre;}</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>Greetings <code>vlc-devel</code>,</p>
<p>As the post in which this message is a reply to has not received any more attention; is there any reason not to merge this patch?</p>
<p>I would like to have this merged as it fixes what is mentioned in the below linked messages:</p>
<ul>
<li>https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/2017-February/111420.html</li>
<li>https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/2017-February/111429.html</li>
</ul>
<p>I sincerely welcome more opinions if such are available.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Filip Roséen</p>
<p>On 2017-02-07 18:51, Filip Roséen wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<pre><code> Hi Francois,
On 2017-02-07 17:45, Francois Cartegnie wrote:</code></pre>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<pre><code> On February 7, 2017 2:15:21 PM GMT+02:00, "Filip Roséen" <filip@atch.se> wrote:</code></pre>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<pre><code> modules/demux/avformat/mux.c | 48
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)</code></pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre><code> That code won't survive any discontinuity.</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre><code> Could you elaborate on how this patch is affecting (worsening) the
discontinuity properties of the module in question? As far as I can
tell the properties remains the same as prior to changes proposed.
Fixing problems related to discontinuity is not mutually exclusive
with this patch; or am I missing something?
Thanks,\
Filip Roséen</code></pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>