<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
<meta name="generator" content="pandoc" />
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">code{white-space: pre;}</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Rémi,</p>
<p>On 2017-02-26 21:32, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<pre><code> vlc | branch: master | Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net> | Sun Feb 26 22:31:05 2017 +0200| [18d92bcdbe2233f6f84cada89fa8ed17ae7a7cf5] | committer: Rémi Denis-Courmont
include: work around LLVM brain damage
Pointed-out-by: Filip Roséen</code></pre>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;color:#500050">
<pre><code> http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/vlc.git/?a=commit;h=18d92bcdbe2233f6f84cada89fa8ed17ae7a7cf5</code></pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>Given that this patch goes against the expressed opinions in the below linked message, I wonder why it was pushed without either a <em>RFC</em> or a continued discussion on the matter (as I believe would have been suitable given the circumstances).</p>
<ul>
<li>https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/2017-February/111745.html</li>
</ul>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Filip</p>
</body>
</html>