<html><head></head><body>Hi,<br><br>No, people do not want mandatory review. That's the suggestion of mandatory review that brought this shitty ambience in the first place, and the UI brokeness. That and you picking on and to a lesser extent on François. Besides, none of the committers, except me, have abode by the week-long wait implied by mandatory review. Also nobody addressed the problem of lack of reviewers in some areas (or time).<br><br>And *you* do not follow mandatory review at all. It was obvious that wrecking the main UI would demotivate existing devs, rebute potential new ones and take months (and counting) to fix - exactly like in 0.9 development. Two people objected (not counting packagers even). And yet you merged it. That's not ho mandatory review works. that's how you ruin the working ambience.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 24 septembre 2019 01:32:36 GMT+03:00, Thomas Guillem <thomas@gllm.fr> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><br><br>On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, at 22:57, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Le maanantaina 23. syyskuuta 2019, 23.26.20 EEST Thomas Guillem a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, at 18:20, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #8ae234; padding-left: 1ex;">So me in public and everybody else privately. Same difference. That's<br>still<br></blockquote>I remember telling François and steve on this ML.<br></blockquote>All I see is asking François if he can send patches for review in the future. <br>Noting from Steve at all.<br></blockquote><br>I speak to Steve regularly, and we do video conf so I might have tel him this way. To be honest I don't remember. <br><br>> <br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">How convenient to remember something that did not happen (sources: vlc-devel <br>archives).<br><br>Well, if that's it, then I remember that the committee did not approve any <br>review mandate. So I am going to flatly ignore all your comments on mandatory <br>reviews until the commitee or the GA passes a resolution on the topic<br></blockquote><br>Why so much tension ? Could we work together again ? It worked quite well in the past few months, every one were respecting each others and each others reviews. It can't work if you ignore me or if I ignore you since we are both main VLC developers... <br><br>I know for a fact that most people want mandatory review. I think it will be voted during the next VDD. In the meantime, I would really love that all core commits go through the ML. I really apprecited your extra effort recently when you went throught the ML. And I always try to send good reviews. <br><br><br>> <br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">-- <br>Реми Дёни-Курмон<br><a href="http://www.remlab.net/">http://www.remlab.net/</a><hr>vlc-devel mailing list<br>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:<br><a href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel">https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel</a><br></blockquote><hr>vlc-devel mailing list<br>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:<br><a href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel">https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel</a></pre></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.</body></html>