<html><head></head><body>I mean that there's several known grave functionality issues, which is why the whole thing is explicitly experimental and unsupported in 3.0.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 27 janvier 2020 14:19:34 GMT+02:00, Alexandre Janniaux <ajanni@videolabs.io> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hi,<br><br>What do you mean ? What are your issues ?<br><br>I use it everyday without much issues, only this and<br>a compositor-specific bug with the Qt fullscreen<br>controller.<br><br>Regards,<br>--<br>Alexandre Janniaux<br>Videolabs<br><br>On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 01:28:06PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi,<br><br> Wayland is mostly unusable in VLC 3.0 for other reasons than inhibiting the screensaver. So I don't see the point in back-porting that.<br><br> Le 27 janvier 2020 12:47:36 GMT+02:00, Alexandre Janniaux <ajanni@videolabs.io> a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br><br>The wayland inhibit module has been there since 2018 thanks to<br>Rémi, but never went to a 3.x release, which means that there<br>is no wayland inhibiter for Wayland compositors.<br><br>The wayland protocol used is experimental and unstable, but<br>can be found on the project repository. [1]<br><br>[1]<br><a href="https://github.com/wayland-project/wayland-protocols/tree/master/unstable/idle-inhibit">https://github.com/wayland-project/wayland-protocols/tree/master/unstable/idle-inhibit</a><br><br>As an unstable protocol, I understand it never went to 3.x<br>branch before, but is supported by at least wlroots (sway)<br>and KDE. It is not supported by GNOME though, which iirc<br>still uses DBus inhibiter.<br><br>As there are reports of inhibiter not working on multiple<br>compositor using this feature, would it make sense to<br>backport this module in 3.x or is it too unstable to be<br>integrated and users should wait 4.0?<br><br>Thanks for your input,<br><br>Regards,<br>--<br>Alexandre Janniaux<br>Videolabs<hr>vlc-devel mailing list<br>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:<br><a href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel">https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel</a><br></blockquote>--<br>Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.<br></blockquote><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><hr>vlc-devel mailing list<br>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:<br><a href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel">https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel</a><br></blockquote><hr>vlc-devel mailing list<br>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:<br><a href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel">https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel</a></pre></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.</body></html>