<!doctype html><html><head><title></title><style type="text/css">p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body>I am not upgrading the requirements. We require C11 with errata for years.<br><br>I don't think it was I who upgraded the requirements from GCC 4.9 to 5, and it was definitely not me that upgraded the stated Clang requirements. Nor do I recall that being discussed as it should have.<br><br>So your mail is completely out of the discussion.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 28 février 2020 10:19:24 GMT+02:00, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@videolan.org> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, at 07:34, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt"><div>This patch enables people to use outdated compilers that will miss modern optimisations and threat mitigation features from newer LLVM versions, which are available for all platforms that any VLC dev cares about. All of that to avoid one apt-get install or equivalent.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That is completely out of the discussion here.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If you want to bump compiler requirements, you ask for that, with good reasons why, like which mitigation features you are talking about, and maybe people will agree with you. You cannot unilaterally bump the requirements, without discussion.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Knowing that SSP is available since at least clang 5, including the strong variant, for example.<br></div><div><br></div><div id="sig60240713"><div class="signature">--<br></div><div class="signature">Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President<br></div><div class="signature">+33 672 704 734<br></div><div class="signature"> <br></div><div class="signature"><br></div></div><div><br></div></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.</body></html>