<html><head></head><body>Konstantin,<br><br>As a reminder, the TC already entertained that same problem on the same OS, for different symbols, in February.<br><br>Of the three considerable options, adjusting the automatic feature tests was, as I recall, the one to be unanimously rejected. I would appreciate if people didn't raise nigh-identical questions to the TC, even if they don't like the previous decisions or recommendations.<br><br>Br,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 2 décembre 2020 10:55:46 GMT+02:00, Konstantin Pavlov <thresh@videolan.org> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Alexandre Janniaux wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br><br>On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Alexandre Janniaux wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> The point of those SDK is to bring backward compatibility while<br> allowing users to dynamically probe for version and function.<br><br> This __is__ similar to what dlsym does, except it's using weak<br> linking instead.<br></blockquote>I'd like to find a consensus on those linkage issues given that it<br>went to TC once, it is breaking the CI since weeks, and is not the<br>only occurence we'll find (I had send similar patches for Android<br>too).<br><br>Maybe we can schedule a meeting to discuss that?<br></blockquote><br>Please send a request to a TC if not yet.<br><br>Breaking CI for weeks when a trivial patch is available is not great.<br><br>Thank you<br></pre></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.</body></html>