might it be that in very low bitrate (like 30-40k for a qcif movie) the mmx does not give much speed up?<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mathieu Monnier</b> <<a href="mailto:manao@melix.net">manao@melix.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi,<br><br>> Can it be due to the fact that I am using Intel Compiler 8 and it<br>> optimize the code well
<br><br>No. Most optimized functions are mmxext ( aka isse ), not just plain<br>mmx. Particularly, sad/satd functions are mmxext, and they account for a<br>lot of time in the encoding process ( according the quality level, of
<br>course )<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Mathieu<br><br>--<br>This is the x264-devel mailing-list<br>To unsubscribe, go to: <a href="http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html">http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html</a><br><br>
</blockquote></div><br>