because it's 10 years old and a step backward?<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/18/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Andrea Barbieri</b> <<a href="mailto:andrea.barbieri@movingimageresearch.com">andrea.barbieri@movingimageresearch.com
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>it seems a pity that a successful multi-platform project needs to take
<br>this stance of in practice limiting itself to just one specific compiler<br>(and possibly versions subset).<br><br>I'm sure you are all aware that ISO C99 features are not available in many<br>commercial C(/C++) compilers and even GCC is not fully compliant:
<br><a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html">http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html</a><br><br>why not simply avoid them altogether and just adhere to C89?<br><br>best regards<br>andrea<br><br>LM:=Loren Merritt<br><br>LM> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, lurui wrote:
<br>LM><br>LM> > under VC, the statement in x264_pixel_ssim_wxh() function:<br>LM> > int sums[2][width/4+3][4];<br>LM> > is error,<br>LM> > I modified the code so it can compiled under VC.<br>LM>
<br>LM> I don't support MSVC. If someone here who has svn write access wants to fix<br>LM> it, making sure that the fix is not slower on gcc/linux, feel free to do so.<br>LM> but I won't review any patches for MSVC.
<br>LM><br>LM> --Loren Merritt<br>LM><br>LM><br><br>--<br>Andrea Barbieri<br>KeyID=0x034DFD5A<br>KeyFingerprint=C1 68 EA 9A 71 89 53 8D 21 4F 12 81 A7 52 9F 32 03 4D FD 5A<br>Moving Image Research, The Workshop, Hampton Lane, Bristol, BS6 6LE, UK
<br>Tel +44 117 9732200, FAX +44 117 9732210<br><a href="http://www.movingimageresearch.com/">http://www.movingimageresearch.com/</a><br><br>--<br>This is the x264-devel mailing-list<br>To unsubscribe, go to: <a href="http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html">
http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>