Hi,<br><br>checkasm isn't useful in this context, it benchmarks individual CPU instructions for comparison across architectures.<br><br>If you want to test x264, why not test x264 directly? If you aren't using an embedded system this should be trivial.<br>
<br>Alex<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Sven Westergren <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sven.westergren@nwise.se">sven.westergren@nwise.se</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="SV">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I’m trying to use the benchmarking
tool checkasm.c to automatically decide if a CPU is capable of encoding and
decoding a live H264 RTP stream, for use in a SIP application.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">My idea is to pick a few of the available
benchmarks and find some threshold where realtime encoding + decoding is not
possible.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Can someone advice me as to which
benchmarks are relevant for a Baseline H264 stream?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Best regards</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Sven Westergren</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
x264-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:x264-devel@videolan.org">x264-devel@videolan.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel" target="_blank">http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>