I figured that would be the mandatory part -- but due to some pre-existing requirements, I can't change from YV12 to NV12. <div><br></div><div>It was worth asking, at least :)</div><div><br></div><div>dennis<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:darkshikari@gmail.com">darkshikari@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">The passing a buffer is feasible, just harder to implement than x264</div>
giving you a buffer. The NV12 part is mandatory, as that's how x264<br>
stores its data internally.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Dark Shikari<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
x264-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:x264-devel@videolan.org">x264-devel@videolan.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel" target="_blank">http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>dennis<br>
</div>