<div dir="ltr">Yes, it is. psy-rdoq is being developed, but in the meantime our tests show rdoq deteriorates quality when psy-rd is enabled.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Derek Buitenhuis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com" target="_blank">derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 6/20/2014 8:00 AM, <a href="mailto:sumalatha@multicorewareinc.com">sumalatha@multicorewareinc.com</a> wrote:<br>


> # HG changeset patch<br>
> # User Sumalatha Polureddy<<a href="mailto:sumalatha@multicorewareinc.com">sumalatha@multicorewareinc.com</a>><br>
> # Date 1403247577 -19800<br>
> # Node ID 3ba3a6ab5df6e140ce1c829e091dc5b2386d122d<br>
> # Parent  57f26a8b7ecbf943ea54b656b2d868d51073a4db<br>
> encoder: disable rdoq when psyrd is enabled<br>
<br>
</div>Wouldn't the proper fix be to have RDOQ take psy into account?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
- Derek<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
x265-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:x265-devel@videolan.org">x265-devel@videolan.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel" target="_blank">https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>