<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/18/2015 09:42 AM, chen wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1190f2b5.18c5.14d67e81db2.Coremail.chenm003@163.com"
      type="cite">
      <div
        style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:arial">
        <div><br>
           </div>
        At 2015-05-19 00:36:01,dave <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dtyx265@gmail.com"><dtyx265@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
        <blockquote id="isReplyContent" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204,
          204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;">
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/18/2015 07:50 AM, chen
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote
            cite="mid:23a1b0a7.1826.14d6780c8cd.Coremail.chenm003@163.com"
            type="cite">
            <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: 1.7;
              font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;">
              <div> </div>
              <pre>At 2015-05-18 10:48:53,<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dtyx265@gmail.com">dtyx265@gmail.com</a> wrote:
># HG changeset patch
># User David T Yuen <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dtyx265@gmail.com"><dtyx265@gmail.com></a>
># Date 1431911615 25200
># Node ID 72bba6b9e99739599d040000be62c7e02a3c8faa
># Parent  465fb4340a241e501b53a6241f5ae81c29ba073a
>asm: interp_4tap_vert_ps_4x2 sse2
>
>Converted vert_pp_4x2 primitive to macro that also creates ps.  This replaces c code for ps with minimal impact on pp.
>
>64-bit
>
>/test/TestBench --testbench interp | grep vp | grep " 4x2"
>chroma_vpp[  4x2]   2.13x    524.99          1117.40
>chroma_vps[  4x2]   1.87x    457.54          854.98
>
>32-bit
>
>./test/TestBench --testbench interp | grep vp | grep " 4x2"
>chroma_vpp[  4x2]   2.34x    592.50          1387.29
>chroma_vps[  4x2]   2.41x    542.48          1304.96
>
>diff -r 465fb4340a24 -r 72bba6b9e997 source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp
>--- a/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp  Sun May 17 18:03:29 2015 -0700
>+++ b/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp  Sun May 17 18:13:35 2015 -0700
>@@ -1450,6 +1450,7 @@
>         p.chroma[X265_CSP_I444].pu[LUMA_4x16].filter_vpp = x265_interp_4tap_vert_pp_4x16_sse2;
>         p.chroma[X265_CSP_I420].pu[CHROMA_420_2x4].filter_vps = x265_interp_4tap_vert_ps_2x4_sse2;
>         p.chroma[X265_CSP_I420].pu[CHROMA_420_2x8].filter_vps = x265_interp_4tap_vert_ps_2x8_sse2;
>+        p.chroma[X265_CSP_I420].pu[CHROMA_420_4x2].filter_vps = x265_interp_4tap_vert_ps_4x2_sse2;
>         p.chroma[X265_CSP_I422].pu[CHROMA_422_2x16].filter_vps = x265_interp_4tap_vert_ps_2x16_sse2;
> #if X86_64
>         p.chroma[X265_CSP_I420].pu[CHROMA_420_6x8].filter_vpp = x265_interp_4tap_vert_pp_6x8_sse2;
>diff -r 465fb4340a24 -r 72bba6b9e997 source/common/x86/ipfilter8.asm
>--- a/source/common/x86/ipfilter8.asm       Sun May 17 18:03:29 2015 -0700
>+++ b/source/common/x86/ipfilter8.asm       Sun May 17 18:13:35 2015 -0700
>@@ -1025,11 +1025,11 @@
>     FILTER_V4_W2_H4_sse2 ps, 16

> ;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-; void interp_4tap_vert_pp_4x2(pixel *src, intptr_t srcStride, pixel *dst, intptr_t dstStride, int coeffIdx)
>-;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>+; void interp_4tap_vert_%1_4x2(pixel *src, intptr_t srcStride, pixel *dst, intptr_t dstStride, int coeffIdx)
>+;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>+%macro  FILTER_V2_W4_H4_sse2 1
> INIT_XMM sse2
>-cglobal interp_4tap_vert_pp_4x2, 4, 6, 8
>-
>+cglobal interp_4tap_vert_%1_4x2, 4, 6, 8
>     mov         r4d,       r4m
>     sub         r0,        r1
>     pxor        m7,        m7
>@@ -1078,6 +1078,8 @@
>     pshuflw     m5,        m3,        q2301
>     pshufhw     m5,        m5,        q2301
>     paddw       m3,        m5
>+
>+%ifidn %1, pp
>     psrld       m2,        16
>     psrld       m3,        16
>     packssdw    m2,        m3
>@@ -1089,7 +1091,24 @@
>     movd        [r2],      m2
>     psrldq      m2,        4
>     movd        [r2 + r3], m2
>-    RET
>+%elifidn %1, ps
>+    psrldq      m2,        2
>+    psrldq      m3,        2
>+    pshufd      m2,        m2, q3120
>+    pshufd      m3,        m3, q3120
>+    punpcklqdq  m2, m3
>+
>+    add         r3d,       r3d
</pre>
              <pre>unneed</pre>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <p> add r3d, r3d unneeded?</p>
          <p>[MC] we may replace below to [r2 + r3 * 2], it is one time
            code<br>
          </p>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    I see, ok.<br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1190f2b5.18c5.14d67e81db2.Coremail.chenm003@163.com"
      type="cite">
      <div
        style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:arial">
        <blockquote id="isReplyContent" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204,
          204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;">
          <p> </p>
          <blockquote
            cite="mid:23a1b0a7.1826.14d6780c8cd.Coremail.chenm003@163.com"
            type="cite">
            <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: 1.7;
              font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;">
              <pre>>+    psubw       m2,        [pw_2000]
>+    movh        [r2],      m2
>+    movhps      [r2 + r3], m2
</pre>
              <pre>MOVHPS because above PUNPCKLQDQ, we didn't need combo and split, same count of instructions and slower on Intel CPU</pre>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <p> Interesting, I initially tried this and it performs slower
            on the bench test on amd, though much more so for 64-bit
            than 32-bit.  I will resubmit.</p>
          <p>[MC] yes, it is faster on AMD CPU, on Intel, these
            instructions choke Port5, the PADD execute on Port1.  I
            often choice faster instrction for Intel because my PC use
            Intel CPU <br>
          </p>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    ... and of course, while I don't follow it very closely, I do
    believe intel still dominates the market.<br>
    <br>
    Do we have any way to determine what the target build is?  Something
    like..<br>
    <br>
    %if INTEL<br>
        optimal intel code<br>
    %elif AMD<br>
        optimal amd code<br>
    %endif<br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1190f2b5.18c5.14d67e81db2.Coremail.chenm003@163.com"
      type="cite">
      <div
        style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:arial">
        <blockquote id="isReplyContent" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204,
          204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;">
          <p> </p>
          <blockquote
            cite="mid:23a1b0a7.1826.14d6780c8cd.Coremail.chenm003@163.com"
            type="cite">
            <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: 1.7;
              font-family: arial; font-size: 14px;">
              <pre>>+%endif
>+    RET
>+
>+%endmacro
>+
</pre>
            </div>
                  </blockquote>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
x265-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:x265-devel@videolan.org">x265-devel@videolan.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel">https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>