<div dir="ltr">The patch didn't touch anywhere near the version code. It's unrelated.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 1 February 2018 at 21:03, Mario Rohkrämer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:contact@ligh.de" target="_blank">contact@ligh.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I just built x265 2.6+37-1949157705ce in MSYS2/MinGW with GCC 7.3.0. Printing a full help page reports at first:<br>
<br>
x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version (null)<br>
x265 [info]: build info (null)<br>
<br>
<br>
A previous version reported e.g.:<br>
<br>
x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version 2.6+27-2f3c4158cf35<br>
x265 [info]: build info [Windows][GCC 7.2.0][64 bit] 8bit+10bit+12bit<br>
<br>
<br>
The only recent patch I would suspect as reason would be:<br>
<br>
CMake: blacklist mingw implicit link libraries<br>
<br>
<a href="https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/commits/a20a6e0fb4f8e261cb0f8c00f0d88f783c5e9155" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bitbucket.org/multicor<wbr>eware/x265/commits/a20a6e0fb4f<wbr>8e261cb0f8c00f0d88f783c5e9155</a><br>
<br>
Did it go one step beyond the intended purpose?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
Fun and success!<br>
Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer<br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:contact@ligh.de" target="_blank">contact@ligh.de</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
x265-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:x265-devel@videolan.org" target="_blank">x265-devel@videolan.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.videolan.org/l<wbr>istinfo/x265-devel</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>