[dvblast-devel] UDP port greater 9999 feature or bug?
Andy Gatward
a.j.gatward at reading.ac.uk
Tue Jan 5 10:09:23 CET 2010
On 05/01/2010 09:02, "Cpulinker" <cpulinker at yandex.ru> wrote:
> With this changes it's work.
> And i don't now if there are need more changes....
> My question is : can be port number 5-digits?
Yes, it was a bug - I forgot the need for a null character on the end of the
string representing the port number. A lot of the code had to be changed
from using integer to string to hold the port number, so getaddrinfo() could
be used to enable IPv6 support.
I have applied your patch to SVN, thanks.
Andy.
--
Andy Gatward <a.j.gatward at reading.ac.uk> +44 (0)118 378 7147
Network Services Specialist, IT Services, University of Reading, UK
More information about the dvblast-devel
mailing list