[dvblast-devel] dvblast: svn commit r146 (massiot)

[Вячеслав Адаманов]

I used   udpxy with dvblast svn   and no any problems.
Prompt please, I can take with encrypted channels encoded videoguard?
hardware:  TT S-3200  with CAM  Videoguard

2010/7/7 Владимир Прудников <vladimir.prudnikov at ho.ipls.ru>:
> I can confirm that there were severe problems with dvblast 1.0 when http proxy (udpxy) was used.
> I will be testing dvblast with latest changes in about a week.
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Jakub Paweł Głazik wrote:
>
>> 2010/6/28 Subversion daemon <svn at videolan.org>:
>>> r146 | massiot | 2010-06-28 23:27:03 +0200 (Mon, 28 Jun 2010) | 2 lines
>>> Changed paths:
>>>   M /trunk/README
>>>   M /trunk/TODO
>>>   M /trunk/asi.c
>>>   M /trunk/demux.c
>>>   M /trunk/dvb.c
>>>   M /trunk/dvblast.c
>>>   M /trunk/dvblast.h
>>>   M /trunk/en50221.c
>>>   M /trunk/output.c
>>>   M /trunk/udp.c
>>>
>>>  * ALL: Introduce a buffering scheme to smooth packet output (see README).
>>
>> How all of the latest changes related to more smooth packet output
>> work when STB gets stream via TCP/HTTP from http proxy?
>>
>> STB <-- tcp/http ---> proxy < -- udp/rtp --> dvblast
>>
>> Should I bother to tune packet output parameters or is this
>> unnecessary because of the TCP transport betweeen STB and proxy (which
>> does some buffering of course) ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> .: Jakub Paweł Głazik,
>> .: email & jabber: zytek<at>nuxi.pl
>> _______________________________________________
>> dvblast-devel mailing list
>> dvblast-devel at videolan.org
>> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/dvblast-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> dvblast-devel mailing list
> dvblast-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/dvblast-devel
>



-- 
__________________________
Adamanov Vyacheslav
87500, Ukraine, Mariupol,
st. Apatova 136а
mob: +38 (067) 621 32 61
email: adamanov at gmail.com
www: http://hl.ua