[dvblast-devel] Passthrough has no effect
basic.master at gmx.de
basic.master at gmx.de
Sun Jul 1 14:12:53 CEST 2018
Hi Christophe,
I just tested it and can conform that passthrough now works. Thank you!
Best regards,
Stefan
Am 30.06.2018 um 21:07 schrieb Christophe Massiot:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Sorry for the delay. I have pushed the implementation and your patch, can you check? If everything is OK I would like to make a release.
>
> Best regards,
>
>> On 13 May 2018, at 17:33, Stefan Pöschel <basic.master at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> as the implementation already exists, I would really appreciate that it
>> is pushed. The reason is that I actually sometimes use dvblast to do a
>> mux dump and to see at the same time whether e.g. any discontinuities occur.
>>
>> Currently I use the "-d" option to output the mux to a localhost port
>> and save it with nc, but I would really prefer to have to use only a
>> single command for a dump, and to have a more direct way without
>> involving loopback. So this would be really useful for me.
>>
>> Or is there any other tool for Linux that provides a similar extent of
>> options to configure the reception parameters and the ability to dump a
>> complete mux?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>> Am 13.05.2018 um 17:17 schrieb Christophe Massiot:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Indeed I apparently never pushed the implementation. Is this of any use to someone, or should we remove the option?
>>>
>>> An alternative would be indeed to output the transponder to a multicast address (using SID *), and record it with multicat.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>> On 13 May 2018, at 09:24, Stefan Pöschel <basic.master at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> the -3/--passthrough parameter currently has no effect. The reason is
>>>> that the variable b_passthrough is set during cmdline parsing, but never
>>>> used (the output_config_t struct has a similar variable by the way).
>>>> My understanding was that I can use this parameter - without any other
>>>> output method - in order to e.g. easily do a transponder dump. Is this
>>>> correct?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Stefan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dvblast-devel mailing list
>>>> dvblast-devel at videolan.org
>>>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/dvblast-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dvblast-devel mailing list
>>> dvblast-devel at videolan.org
>>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/dvblast-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dvblast-devel mailing list
>> dvblast-devel at videolan.org
>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/dvblast-devel
>
>
More information about the dvblast-devel
mailing list