[mpris] Fwd: MPRIS v2 proposal
Ian Monroe
ian.monroe at gmail.com
Wed Apr 1 17:28:02 CEST 2009
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Oben Sonne <obensonne at googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/4/1 Mirsal Ennaime <mirsal.ennaime at gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jean-Paul Saman <jean-paul.saman at m2x.nl> wrote:
>>> Hello mirsal,
>> Hello
>>
>>> As one of the original authors of MPRIS specification and implementation
>>> in VLC I hereby sent you a proposal for extending/updating this
>>> specification.
>>>
>>> I use the MPRIS specification a lot in solutions using VLC. It is an
>>> awsome IPC (Interprocess communication protocol). However for advanced
>>> usage it is quite limited, some information that you can find in media
>>> players user interface are not available through MPRIS v1 specification.
>>> Therefore here my proposal for an extension.
>>>
>>> Please comment on my proposal.
>>
>> I'm sorry about the delay, my personal mailbox got swamped.
>>
>> The first version of MPRIS was written with only audio players in
>> mind, so there were clear lacks in this domain, so adding /ES is IMO a
>> good idea.
>>
>> I have a few objections however:
>> - Rate control methods should reside in /Player, not in /TrackList
>> - /ES related caps should be more granular (I'd add
>> CAN_CONTROL_SUBTITLES and CAN CONTROL_TELETEXT)
>> - CAN_RATE may be better named CAN_CONTROL_RATE
>>
>> There are other issues to be fixed before 2.0 can be released though.
>> Thanks for your proposal, I'm forwarding it to the MPRIS mailing list.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> --
>> Mirsal Ennaime
>
> Nice to here that this useful interface is going to be extended.
>
> The last mail only seems to list changes to a previous v2 proposal. Is
> there a place to review the complete current state of MPRIS v2 ?
Yes, and what is 'ES' and why can't it have a real name?
Also the proposal only has extensions... if we're not breaking
capability with 1.0 it should be 1.1 or something, not 2.0.
Ian
More information about the mpris
mailing list