[streaming] Re: How to stream high-def video over a LAN?
James Burns
jfburns at gmail.com
Wed Mar 2 12:33:52 CET 2005
Depending on the quality of the card / driver you're using, there
might be some room for improvement there. If you're using encryption
over the wireless (which I think you mentioned it was) then that takes
a lot of processing. Also some cards / drivers are just more efficient
than others with hardware buffering, DMA, etc. If possible you might
want to look for "a more expensive card" (price tends to correspond
with "goodness") to see if it does better.
-James
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:47:20 -0600, Chhaya, Harshal <hchhaya at ti.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, the fact the file can be read from a file leads either
> > to think of packet loss related to issues in the network, or
> > in the ethernel card / ethernet card drivers. How is the CPU
> > usage when reading from network, compared to from file, what
> > are the error messages given by VLC ?
>
> Ben,
>
> The average CPU usage when playing a local file is about
> 65-70% but it is ~90% when playing a streamed version of
> the same file. Also, the kernel portion of the usage is
> much higher when playing the stream probably because of
> the network driver ((~30% compared to less than 10%).
>
--
This is the streaming mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/streaming/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/support/lists.html
More information about the streaming
mailing list