massiot at via.ecp.fr
Fri Feb 22 21:55:43 CET 2002
Maybe we should consider discussing our (non-existant) roadmap. The
first issue we have to tackle is the version numbering. I don't think
next version should be 0.2.93, since there has been major
improvements since 0.2.92. We can then consider several choices, such
as 0.2.95, 0.2.99, 0.9, which depend on what we want to do next.
A big question is : when the hell are we releasing 1.0 ? VLC has been
out there for long now, and I don't think it still deserves a < 0.3
number. I'd say the major feature we lack to get an excellent media
player is DVD menus (plus many bug fixes, of course). As a
consequence, I think we should jump to 1.0 when we have DVD menus.
What do we do before then ? We can say that current CVS is almost-0.3
release, and call the next version 0.2.99 or 0.2.95, in prevision of
an early 0.3 release. We can say that current CVS will soon lead to
1.0 and start 0.9.x preleases. What do you think ?
Another problem is that for the moment, no one is willing to work on
DVD menus :-(. And don't ask me, I do not even have a DVD drive :-).
We have yet another decision to take. VLC uses more and more external
libraries, and I expect this to increase in the future. We can
currently optionally use libmad, liba52, and libdvdread, but they are
not activated by default. We'll probably need another library for DVD
menus. Since those libraries provide better performance, better
reliability and better features, I think we should drop support for
the built-in replacements (dvd, ac3_adec and mpeg_adec plug-ins).
When ? It isn't as easy as it seems. We need to provide easy access
to the libraries in some way (putting packages on the web site ?).
But more important, we need to ensure that these libraries compile
and run on all platforms we support, and port them is necessary. This
is quite a big job, and I don't know if we get enough feedback to do
so. We'd probably need a responsive « port maintainer » for all
On a related note, libdvdcss is in the CVS of VLC, and now has its
own CVS. When do we remove it from VLC's CVS ?
This is the vlc-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
More information about the vlc-devel