[vlc-devel] Re: VLC 0.5.4

Jason Luka jason at geshp.com
Mon May 5 17:37:05 CEST 2003


Okay, so we're removing ffmpeg altogether from the next release?

You wrote:

> From: Gildas Bazin <gbazin at netcourrier.com>
> To: vlc-devel at videolan.org
> Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 12:49:10 +0200
> Subject: [vlc-devel] Re: VLC 0.5.4
> 
> 
> On Monday 05 May 2003 02:15, Jason Luka wrote:
> > A few questions:
> > 1) What's the URL for libmpeg2 then?
> 
> libmpeg2.sf.net
> 
> > 2) Are you sure ffmpeg won't cover it?
> 
> Yes. We made the decision to switch to libmpeg2 because it is faster as well 
> as more error resiliant than our builtin mpeg video decoder (and ffmpeg).
> 
> > 3) Do I need to compile new seperate RPMs for libmpeg2?
> > 
> 
> The best would be to compile libmpeg2 statically with vlc (for now) because 
> being a cvs version, the api could change again before the 0.3.2 release.
> 
> --
> Gildas
> -- 
> This is the vlc-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
> To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
> If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
> 
> 
-- 
This is the vlc-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>



More information about the vlc-devel mailing list