[vlc-devel] Re: VLC 0.5.4
Jason Luka
jason at geshp.com
Mon May 5 17:37:05 CEST 2003
Okay, so we're removing ffmpeg altogether from the next release?
You wrote:
> From: Gildas Bazin <gbazin at netcourrier.com>
> To: vlc-devel at videolan.org
> Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 12:49:10 +0200
> Subject: [vlc-devel] Re: VLC 0.5.4
>
>
> On Monday 05 May 2003 02:15, Jason Luka wrote:
> > A few questions:
> > 1) What's the URL for libmpeg2 then?
>
> libmpeg2.sf.net
>
> > 2) Are you sure ffmpeg won't cover it?
>
> Yes. We made the decision to switch to libmpeg2 because it is faster as well
> as more error resiliant than our builtin mpeg video decoder (and ffmpeg).
>
> > 3) Do I need to compile new seperate RPMs for libmpeg2?
> >
>
> The best would be to compile libmpeg2 statically with vlc (for now) because
> being a cvs version, the api could change again before the 0.3.2 release.
>
> --
> Gildas
> --
> This is the vlc-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
> To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
> If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
>
>
--
This is the vlc-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list