[vlc-devel] Re: vlc: svn commit r18711 (courmisch)

Rémi Denis-Courmont rem at videolan.org
Fri Feb 9 21:10:58 CET 2007

Le mercredi 7 février 2007 11:37, vous avez écrit :
> > > Doing raw UDPlite makes IMHO no sense; raw UDP is flawed so
> > > there's no need to take its bugs to brand new implementation
> > > where we don't have to keep backwards compatibility.
> >
> > Supporting it in SDP might indeed be nonsensical. At the access
> > plugin level, it does not cost anything.
> I'd say we should disable it at least on access-output, otherwise
> some clueless people would start using it and complain there's no SDP
> support :-)

Right. In fact, "rtplite://" might be confusing for RTP over UDP-Lite, 
so then we'd only "udplite://" for that, and not provide raw UDP-Lite.

By the way, shouldn't it be UDPLite/RTP/AVP rather than 
RTP/AVP/UDPLite ? (considering how DCCP is supposed to be)

Rémi Denis-Courmont
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20070209/d6a29937/attachment.sig>

More information about the vlc-devel mailing list