[vlc-devel] Re: 0.8.6b plans?

[Pavlov Konstantin]

On Monday 15 January 2007 18:51, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> Quoting Rémi Denis-Courmont <rem at videolan.org>:
> > Le lundi 15 janvier 2007 09:12, Marian Durkovic a écrit :
> >>   what is the time plan with 0.8.6b? I think it would make sense to
> >> e.g. include fixes for e.g. #969, #948 ...
> >
> > #969 looks fairly safe to backport (would you mind doing it?).
> >
> > #948 has no fix yet.
>
> I don't think #948 will ever have a backport. IIRC, ffmpeg SVN does
> not fit with VLC 0.8.6, and thus linking them together will bear a to
> high risk of breakage.

What's the problem of linking 0.8.6a against ffmpeg SVN? 
Here it works just fine (i hadnt checked vp31, though), but in all other cases 
it works perfectly stable here. FFmpeg is built shared, of course.

-- 
Pavlov Konstantin,
ALT Linux Team,
VideoLAN Team,
jid: thresh at altlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20070117/a173c849/attachment.sig>