[vlc-devel] Re: SoC Propositions.

Rémi Denis-Courmont rem at videolan.org
Thu Mar 8 19:38:14 CET 2007

Anything that is a "rework", including Subtitle and RTSP has large 
chance of being rejected. I feel like I'm repeating myself. SoC is 
about adding (costly) features.

IMHO, we don't care about the WinCE port.

I don't even understand what VLM schedule work means. This is a bad 
benchmark. A real live/scheduled dump/record system would be great 
though but that's not really VLM (since it might apply to playlist to a 
large extent).

What's wrong with our RTP packetizer? I removed it until someone can 
explain the problem.

Also removed RTCP and TCP framing server support as we already have 
that, or almost in trunk.

Rémi Denis-Courmont
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20070308/61c851fd/attachment.sig>

More information about the vlc-devel mailing list