[vlc-devel] Re: [Patch] better support for more recent pvr: drivers
Paul Corke
paul.corke at datatote.co.uk
Wed Mar 28 23:12:33 CEST 2007
Antoine Cellerier wrote:
:: jpsaman commented on your patch but i'm not sure that
:: you got the answer since you're not on the list.
I am on the list, but our corporate spam checker ate the
message :(
On Tue 27/03/2007 08:52, Jean-Paul Saman wrote:
> > The videodev2.h file is copied from the ivtv sources.
>
> Please don't do that, just create a check for videodev2.h in
> configure.ac when pvr is selected.
The original vlc (eg 0.8.6) has a copy of videodev2.h in the
modules/access/ directory. If I check in configure for the
system copy of videodev2.h then:
1) I have to make sure that pvr.c does not use the old
videodev2.h in modules/access/ (easy: just delete that
file)
2) A vlc built on an older machine with an older
/usr/include/linux/videodev2.h would not be able to
compile in features that are needed on a newer kernel
/ ivtvdriver. The build would have to be on a new machine.
3) In my build environment (Fedora Core 5 with 2.6.20-1.2300.fc5)
trying to build my patched pvr.c using the system
/usr/include/linux/videodev2.h does not work because
it is too old a version of the file!
Unless there is a way around this, I think we're stuck
with using a local copy of videodev2.h :(
> I found some minor improvements for readibility. See the
> code below.
Ok, I'm happy to make those cosmetic changes. I would
justify my preference for "++p_controls->count;" to
your "p_controls->count++;" because I usually write in
C++ and pre-increment is more efficient there!
> but perhaps the original author can comment also?
Yes please!
Paul.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3649 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20070328/afa39c31/attachment.bin>
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list