[vlc-devel] commit: Revived vout_Destroy from the dead. (Laurent Aimar )
Laurent Aimar
fenrir at via.ecp.fr
Thu Jul 17 22:11:53 CEST 2008
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:29 PM, Laurent Aimar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:58 PM, git version control wrote:
> >>
> >>> vlc | branch: master | Laurent Aimar <fenrir at videolan.org> | Thu Jul
> >>> 17 19:53:47 2008 +0200| [dd066314d5dde1a5d828d2c51c0296dd7b04bac7]
> >>>
> >>> Revived vout_Destroy from the dead.
> >>> No you CANNOT release a vout by vlc_object_release if you have
> >>> created
> >>> it by vout_Request or vout_Create.
> >>
> >> That do need a special case handling to make sure the object isn't
> >> destroyed if vout_Destructor hasn't been called first.
> > No. The vout will NEVER be destroyed by someone else. If you create a
> > vout, you are the only one that call destroy on it.
>
> Well, I am not saying this should happen, I am saying that it is a
> good idea to track bad usage. (Such as what leak check and so on)...
> Don't worry I'll implement.
Ok, a simple assert should do the trick then.
> >> I am re-reading that code and vout_Destroy is actually vout_Close.
> >> Because vout_Destroy doesn't actually destroy the vout, but only
> >> close
> >> it.
> > I would prefer keeping vout_Create/Destroy (Create/Close is
> > confusing).
> > Beside it actually destroy the object unless someone has done a
> > vlc_object_find
> > on it.
>
> Well, so that's my point. We can't assume that after vout_Destroy the
> object is destroyed... Well that probably sound like too much wording,
> but I insist here :P
>
> >> If there is no objection, I'll change that confusing name (and
> >> probably remove the vlc_object_release from here).
> > You cannot remove the vlc_object_release inside vout_Destroy or
> > everyone
> > will have to call vout_Close AND vlc_object_release. (That's why
> > vout_Destroy)
>
> We would call vout_Close+ vlc_object_release vout_CloseAndRelease().
> It's closer to reality.
Ok for renaming vout_Destroy to vout_CloseAndRelease if you insist
(don't forget to update the documentation of vout_Request/vout_Create
in vlc_vout.h)
--
fenrir
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list