[vlc-devel] Future of the update mechanism

Rafaël Carré rafael.carre at gmail.com
Thu Jul 30 17:12:15 CEST 2009

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:37:06 +0300
"Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi at remlab.net> wrote:

> From what's been said, it would seem that Sparkle fails the "Windows" 
> requirement as well as the "security without TLS" requirement.

It seems the security model of Sparkle can be either SSL connections,
either DSA signature checking which can be downloaded over HTTP (which
is what the code in src/ does)

Rafaël Carré
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20090730/d687953f/attachment.sig>

More information about the vlc-devel mailing list