[vlc-devel] [RFC] V4L2 caching

[Rémi Denis-Courmont]

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:06:33 +0300, "Rémi Denis-Courmont"
<remi at remlab.net> wrote:
> V4L2 default caching seems quite big to me, considering that V4L2
> shouldn't 
> have much delay variance. Is there any reason for using the common
default
> 
> there? OTOH, it seems VLC can never recover if the PTS delay value is too

> small (it keeps on increasing the PTS delay, but I never see any new
> frame).

Since nobody seems to care, I'll take the freedom to decide alone.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont