[vlc-devel] vlc x246 benchmark

[Tony Anecito]

Is there different settings needed for 1.1 versus 0.9.0.6?
Reason I am asking is I am thinking of switching to 1.1.

Also, having asked that how much usage has 1.0 seen? I like going with 1.1 or 1.2 becuase the risk is smaller which is why I ask.

Thanks,
-Tony

--- On Mon, 3/22/10, Jure Pečar <pegasus at nerv.eu.org> wrote:

> From: Jure Pečar <pegasus at nerv.eu.org>
> Subject: Re: [vlc-devel] vlc x246 benchmark
> To: vlc-devel at videolan.org
> Date: Monday, March 22, 2010, 2:47 AM
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:40:50 +0200
> Kaarlo Räihä <kaarlo.raiha at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > The basic questions first:
> > 1. You compile the kernels manually? (and always with
> same options?)
> No, they're distro provided (ubuntu).
> 
> > 2. You run multicore box? (and use Auto option for
> threads with x264?)
> Yes, quad core. No special options regarding threads. I'd
> expect vlc to do the right thing with multiple cores.
> Command I used was:
> 
> vlc --sout-mux-caching=1000 \
>     --no-sout-transcode-hurry-up \
>     --file-caching=1000 \
>    
> --sout='#transcode{venc=x264,vb=800,fps=25,width=640,height=480,acodec=mp4a,ab=200,scale=1,samplerate=44100,channels=2,audio-sync,deinterlace}:standard{access=file,mux=ts,dst=/dev/null}'
> stream.dump > /dev/null 2>&1
> 
> It seems I have to investigate:
> --sout-transcode-threads
> --sout-transcode-high-priority
> --sout-x264-mvrange-thread
> --sout-x264-non-deterministic
> 
> Any other recommendations?
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Jure Pečar
> http://jure.pecar.org
> _______________________________________________
> vlc-devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>