[vlc-devel] vlc x246 benchmark
adanecito at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 22 17:56:32 CET 2010
Is there different settings needed for 1.1 versus 0.9.0.6?
Reason I am asking is I am thinking of switching to 1.1.
Also, having asked that how much usage has 1.0 seen? I like going with 1.1 or 1.2 becuase the risk is smaller which is why I ask.
--- On Mon, 3/22/10, Jure Pečar <pegasus at nerv.eu.org> wrote:
> From: Jure Pečar <pegasus at nerv.eu.org>
> Subject: Re: [vlc-devel] vlc x246 benchmark
> To: vlc-devel at videolan.org
> Date: Monday, March 22, 2010, 2:47 AM
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:40:50 +0200
> Kaarlo Räihä <kaarlo.raiha at gmail.com>
> > The basic questions first:
> > 1. You compile the kernels manually? (and always with
> same options?)
> No, they're distro provided (ubuntu).
> > 2. You run multicore box? (and use Auto option for
> threads with x264?)
> Yes, quad core. No special options regarding threads. I'd
> expect vlc to do the right thing with multiple cores.
> Command I used was:
> vlc --sout-mux-caching=1000 \
> --no-sout-transcode-hurry-up \
> --file-caching=1000 \
> stream.dump > /dev/null 2>&1
> It seems I have to investigate:
> Any other recommendations?
> Jure Pečar
> vlc-devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
More information about the vlc-devel