[vlc-devel] [RFC] Bug severity definitions

Rafaël Carré rafael.carre at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 21:11:31 CEST 2010

On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:49:39 +0200
Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb at videolan.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:05:28PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote :
> > I am totally fed up with arguments on Trac about what severity
> > (and/or priority) a bug should have. And I know I am not the only
> > one.
> +1

yes me too

> > To cut it short, I would like to propose definitions for
> > severities. We can 
> I more or less agree. I would argue about major vs normal, but that is
> too trivial a distinction, as far as I am concerned.

i think the severity definition is left as an exercise to the developer
as it can not be formally defined (e.g. "50% of userbase" is not formal)

> > As for priorities, I would really like to REMOVE them.
> +10

ok with me, we can always leave ONE priority so they aren't really
removed but not meaningful either

> > agile organizations, where some managers can decide what to work on
> > first. 
> I want agile in VLC... But I also want money, and a poney...

and honey

> Best Regards,
> PS: ... and a unicorn :D

and pop-corn!

✍ Rafaël Carré ☺
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20101014/2177ee0e/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the vlc-devel mailing list