On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:20:53AM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote : > For omxil, the nal size has already been parsed out elsewhere, so > we don't need it returned here. Applied, thanks. Best Regards, -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device