[vlc-devel] The case for 2.0
fkuehne.videolan at googlemail.com
Tue Jan 10 12:43:30 CET 2012
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Jean-Paul Saman <jpsaman at videolan.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Rob Jonson <rob at hobbyistsoftware.com> wrote:
>> I suggest calling it 2.0 as suggested and moving on to more important matters.
> Renaming 1.2 to 2.0 sounds like a good plan. No objections from me.
Same here, actually.
More information about the vlc-devel