Am 28.11.2014 um 10:33 schrieb Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi at remlab.net>: > This implies that 0d881ef1d5c711e96236c97aa1e8d196fda7e9d7 is not portable and wrong, which is FALSE Out of curiosity: Why? Any docu I find tells that PRIuMAX is exactly meant for uintmax_t. BR. David