[vlc-devel] [PATCH] Only use --rtsp-client-port when sending RTSP SETUP request

[David R. Robison]

Just wanted to follow up to see if this patch was successfully applied. 
David

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

*David R Robison*

/Principal Systems Engineer/

O. +1 757 546 3401

M. +1 757 286 0022

david.robison at q-free.com <mailto:david.robison at q-free.com>

www.q-free.com/openroads

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q-Free Open Roads

103 Watson Road

Chesapeake VA 23320

On 7/7/2015 10:10 AM, David R. Robison wrote:
> Did this patch apply correctly? David
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *David R Robison*
>
> /Principal Systems Engineer/
>
> O. +1 757 546 3401
>
> M. +1 757 286 0022
>
> david.robison at q-free.com <mailto:david.robison at q-free.com>
>
> www.q-free.com/openroads
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Q-Free Open Roads
>
> 103 Watson Road
>
> Chesapeake VA 23320
>
> On 7/7/2015 7:25 AM, David R. Robison wrote:
>> Yes, that is the case. When using an embedded player where you set 
>> the --rtp-client-port you can only play RTSP feeds. Feeds defined in 
>> SDP (such as multicast feeds) fail to play.
>> David
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *David R Robison*
>>
>> /Principal Systems Engineer/
>>
>> O. +1 757 546 3401
>>
>> M. +1 757 286 0022
>>
>> david.robison at q-free.com <mailto:david.robison at q-free.com>
>>
>> www.q-free.com/openroads
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Q-Free Open Roads
>>
>> 103 Watson Road
>>
>> Chesapeake VA 23320
>>
>> On 7/7/2015 5:05 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>>> Le 2015-07-07 11:21, Julian Scheel a écrit :
>>>> What's the point of moving the setClientPortNum call? Besides that it
>>>> wouldn't be called when initiate() fails or loading of live555 is
>>>> aborted because of REAL codec being used it shouldn't change anything.
>>>> So is this just for cosmetics or has it some functional relevance?
>>>
>>> Apparently, live555 alllows overriding the client port even for pure 
>>> declarative SDP. Makes no sense but...
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> vlc-devel mailing list
>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vlc-devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20150710/090ad0bb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: orci-qfree.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20150710/090ad0bb/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 4603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20150710/090ad0bb/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 4603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20150710/090ad0bb/attachment-0002.png>