[vlc-devel] [RFC 00/38] removal of implicit/explicit use of abort

[Filip Roséen]

>      Le 2016-06-27 13:43, Filip Roséen a écrit :
>     The problem which these patches all (try) to solve is relatively easy; we do
>     not want to invoke `abort`, instead we rather have the potential error
>     propogate up until the relevant part of the code.
>      This patch series seems to fail to actually do that properly. I cannot be bothered to
>      review such a large series when some of the first entries are so dubious.

As stated in the below linked reply these patches are sadly from the wrong
branch, but I am surprised that even the first few entries are considered
dubious.

 - Maybe it helps to provide some deeper rationale in the (now lacking)
   commit-descriptions?

I will manually compared the two branches that I have locally, and then
make sure that only things that are proper solutions ends up on the
mailing-list at a later time (and maybe even format everything differently
so that people do not get this many emails containing just a few diffs).

Thank you for your feedback!

Best Regards,

Filip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20160627/15770e86/attachment.html>