[vlc-devel] [PATCH] vout: make spu_t mandatory
Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
hugo at beauzee.fr
Mon Jun 3 15:01:23 CEST 2019
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, at 2:57 PM, Thomas Guillem wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, at 14:43, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, at 2:40 PM, Thomas Guillem wrote:
> > > Since spu_Create() is very unlikely to fail (only ENOMEM)
> > > ---
> > > src/video_output/video_output.c | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/video_output/video_output.c b/src/video_output/video_output.c
> > > index c941a3ded9..2fc98e0662 100644
> > > --- a/src/video_output/video_output.c
> > > +++ b/src/video_output/video_output.c
> > > @@ -273,8 +273,7 @@ int vout_RegisterSubpictureChannel( vout_thread_t *vout )
> > > int channel = VOUT_SPU_CHANNEL_AVAIL_FIRST;
> > >
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > - if (vout->p->spu)
> > > - channel = spu_RegisterChannel(vout->p->spu);
> > > + channel = spu_RegisterChannel(vout->p->spu);
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > >
> > > return channel;
> > > @@ -284,8 +283,7 @@ void vout_SetSubpictureClock( vout_thread_t *vout,
> > > vlc_clock_t *clock )
> > > {
> > > assert(!vout->p->dummy);
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > - if (vout->p->spu)
> > > - spu_clock_Set(vout->p->spu, clock);
> > > + spu_clock_Set(vout->p->spu, clock);
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -295,8 +293,7 @@ void vout_FlushSubpictureChannel( vout_thread_t
> > > *vout, int channel )
> > > assert(!sys->dummy);
> > >
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&sys->spu_lock);
> > > - if (sys->spu != NULL)
> > > - spu_ClearChannel(vout->p->spu, channel);
> > > + spu_ClearChannel(vout->p->spu, channel);
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&sys->spu_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -305,8 +302,7 @@ void vout_SetSpuHighlight( vout_thread_t *vout,
> > > {
> > > assert(!vout->p->dummy);
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > - if (vout->p->spu)
> > > - spu_SetHighlight(vout->p->spu, spu_hl);
> > > + spu_SetHighlight(vout->p->spu, spu_hl);
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -584,8 +580,7 @@ void vout_ControlChangeSubSources(vout_thread_t
> > > *vout, const char *filters)
> > > {
> > > assert(!vout->p->dummy);
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > - if (likely(vout->p->spu != NULL))
> > > - spu_ChangeSources(vout->p->spu, filters);
> > > + spu_ChangeSources(vout->p->spu, filters);
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -593,16 +588,13 @@ void vout_ControlChangeSubFilters(vout_thread_t
> > > *vout, const char *filters)
> > > {
> > > assert(!vout->p->dummy);
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > - if (likely(vout->p->spu != NULL))
> > > - spu_ChangeFilters(vout->p->spu, filters);
> > > + spu_ChangeFilters(vout->p->spu, filters);
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > void vout_ChangeSubMargin(vout_thread_t *vout, int margin)
> > > {
> > > assert(!vout->p->dummy);
> > > - if (unlikely(vout->p->spu == NULL))
> > > - return;
> > >
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > spu_ChangeMargin(vout->p->spu, margin);
> > > @@ -1307,11 +1299,8 @@ static void vout_FlushUnlocked(vout_thread_t
> > > *vout, bool below,
> > > vlc_clock_SetDelay(vout->p->clock, vout->p->delay);
> > >
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > - if (vout->p->spu)
> > > - {
> > > - spu_clock_Reset(vout->p->spu);
> > > - spu_clock_SetDelay(vout->p->spu, vout->p->spu_delay);
> > > - }
> > > + spu_clock_Reset(vout->p->spu);
> > > + spu_clock_SetDelay(vout->p->spu, vout->p->spu_delay);
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1374,8 +1363,7 @@ void vout_ChangeSpuDelay(vout_thread_t *vout,
> > > vlc_tick_t delay)
> > > {
> > > assert(!vout->p->dummy);
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > - if (vout->p->spu)
> > > - spu_clock_SetDelay(vout->p->spu, delay);
> > > + spu_clock_SetDelay(vout->p->spu, delay);
> > > vout->p->spu_delay = delay;
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&vout->p->spu_lock);
> > > }
> > > @@ -1726,7 +1714,6 @@ void vout_Close(vout_thread_t *vout)
> > >
> > > vlc_mutex_lock(&sys->spu_lock);
> > > spu_Destroy(sys->spu);
> > > - sys->spu = NULL;
> > > vlc_mutex_unlock(&sys->spu_lock);
> > >
> > > vout_Release(vout);
> > > @@ -1827,8 +1814,13 @@ vout_thread_t *vout_Create(vlc_object_t *object)
> > > vout_statistic_Init(&sys->statistic);
> > >
> > > /* Initialize subpicture unit */
> > > - vlc_mutex_init(&sys->spu_lock);
> > > sys->spu = spu_Create(vout, vout);
> > > + if (!sys->spu)
> > > + {
> > > + vlc_object_delete(vout);
> > > + return NULL;
> > > + }
> > > + vlc_mutex_init(&sys->spu_lock);
> > >
> > > vout_control_Init(&sys->control);
> > >
> > > @@ -1846,6 +1838,7 @@ vout_thread_t *vout_Create(vlc_object_t *object)
> > > sys->display_cfg.window = vout_display_window_New(vout);
> > > if (sys->display_cfg.window == NULL) {
> > > spu_Destroy(sys->spu);
> > > + vlc_mutex_destroy(&sys->spu_lock);
> > > vlc_object_delete(vout);
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> >
> > Shouldn't spu allowed to be NULL in case VLC is run with --no-spu?
>
> --no-spu *and* --no-osd. But that's a rare case. Not sure that we
> should do a very little optim for that case.
>
> >
IMO it should be a valid case when thumbnailing, for which the fontconfig initialization hit is non negligible (last time I checked, at least)
--
Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
hugo at beauzee.fr
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list