[vlc-devel] [vlc-commits] modules: store object name in a variable

[Rémi Denis-Courmont]

Yeah. And we never agreed to un-deprecate object names and allow them to be used by plugins back again. And I did even remind of the deprecation at the last workshop less than two weeks ago - not exactly a surprise.

What you want is that all changes are agreed upon by you. That's not what we agreed.

Le 5 mars 2019 10:48:21 GMT+02:00, Thomas Guillem <thomas at gllm.fr> a écrit :
>On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, at 09:43, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> No. I am not accountable for bugs pushed by Antoine (object names),
>the other Rémi (Qt objects tree) and François (adding code using a
>feature that's already deprecated and of course without review).
>
>And that is why, we decided to always go to the mailing list when we
>add/remove new features or modify the VLC/LibVLC core API. It's useless
>to lament on what was done on the past or find a culprit for bad things
>that were done a *long* time ago.
>
>> 
>> Unlike you, I have spent days trying to fix these things with
>variable success. And now, you are preventing me from fixing that for
>good.
>> 
>> So if somebody's accountable, it's you.
>> 
>> Le 5 mars 2019 10:17:34 GMT+02:00, Steve Lhomme <robux4 at ycbcr.xyz> a
>écrit :
>>> On 3/5/2019 8:52 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>>>> I am not going to hold your hand running git-log or git-blame. The 
>>>> facts are there, you just don't care to look for them preferring to
>
>>>> band against me.
>>> 
>>> You're accountable for the things you push on VLC just like the rest
>of 
>>> us. If people disagree with a change you made without discussing you
>
>>> have to explain why, just like the rest of us. Saying it was already
>
>>> discussed 10 years ago (as a flamewar, so definitely not in the SVN 
>>> logs) with other people is not a way to collaborate.
>>> 
>>> >
>>>>  And it's not exactly rocket science that introspection does not
>work 
>>>>  across threads - in general, not just in VLC.
>>>> 
>>>>  Le 5 mars 2019 09:03:43 GMT+02:00, Steve Lhomme <robux4 at ycbcr.xyz>
>a 
>>>>  écrit :
>>>> 
>>>>      On 3/4/2019 9:51 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>          Decreeing that discussions older than 3 is irrelevant is
>>>>          ridiculous. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>      Yes and no. Valid points many years ago are likely to be valid
>today.
>>>>      But if we're not presented with them there is no way to know.
>The code
>>>>      has changed a lot in the last few years and will continue to
>do so. Some
>>>>      things that used to be true may not be anymore and vice versa.
>But we
>>>>      need the facts, not "it was discussed 9 years ago, end of
>discussion".     vlc-devel mailing list
>>>>      To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
>>>>      https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  -- 
>>>>  Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez 
>>>>  excuser ma brièveté. vlc-devel mailing list
>>>>  To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
>>>>  https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>>> vlc-devel mailing list
>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
>>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>> 
>> -- 
>> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez
>excuser ma brièveté. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> vlc-devel mailing list
>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel

-- 
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20190305/d77076e8/attachment.html>