[vlc] Re: How is DVB with VLC really used?
Jean-Paul Saman
jean-paul.saman at planet.nl
Fri Jun 4 08:17:53 CEST 2004
Jan Ekholm wrote:
>On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Jan Ekholm wrote:
>
>
>
>>Btw, DVB-t seems to work better than DVB-s, I gave up on that a while ago.
>>Tuning is easier and there have been no failures so far, which is really
>>great!
>>
>>
>
>Hm, no, it still tunes all over the map. It just tunes to whatever was
>last successfully tuned, totally ignoring any kind of frequency. Something
>like this (with a random amount of 0:s) should IMHO work to tune to
>538MHz:
>
> % vlc dvb:frequency=538000000:fec=2
>
>
Are you tuning DVB-T or DVB-S now? Do you have a log?
>But it tunes to 714Mhz which was what I had tuned to using dvbstream a
>while ago. Giving fec=9 or anything else makes no difference.
>
>Is there any reason why the tuning code from tzap, czap and szap is not
>silently lifted into VLC to do the tuning and have VLC use a normal
>channels.conf?
>
VLC now uses the same method for tuning as dvbstream. The previous code
was using the same method as t/c/szap (an earlier version) by the way.
The channels.conf question. ... wel nobody had have time to do this
uptill now, so feel free to start ;-).
Using channel names to tune to stations is more intuitive for
non-technical users and would be a great addition to VLC.
--
Many greetings,
Jean-Paul Saman
Consultant
--------------------------------------------------------------
VLC iPAQ maintainer http://www.videolan.org
RedHat Certified Engineer RHCE number: 807202745005548
--------------------------------------------------------------
--
This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/support/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
More information about the vlc
mailing list