Is my VLS broken?? ( was,Does the Windows client work with vls?)

[Darryl Cording]

G'Day,

> An, interesting thing is, that when vls is streaming the DVD it consumes
> 99-100% of one of the CPU's. Is that normal???? When playing a DVD
>  locally via vlc is gobbles only around 25-30% of a CPU. I understand vls
> has more work to do, but does 100% utilisation sound correct, even
> though there is no X/rendering overhead.
I run strace on the running vls server and it reports this.......


select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)
select(10, [8 9], [], [], {1, 0})       = 0 (Timeout)

Seems it is stuck in the select() operation. I'll have to try and track
down which area of the code this is in. I notice that the debug option
is on by default at compile time, is there anyway to get more debug info
when vls is running ??

Thanks for any replies,
regards
Darryl


-- 
This is the vls-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vls-devel/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>