[x264-devel] Re: JM 9.6 vs. x264 rev 228: results

[Hemantha Kodikara Arachchi]

Hi,
Interesting work... but I have a problem in viewing the web page. Either 
MSIE or Firefox does not render EPS images. Do I need to use any plug-in 
which works on Win2000 based PC?
Sorry for the out-of-subject question...
Hemantha

On 5/18/05, Tuukka Toivonen <tuukkat at ee.oulu.fi> wrote:
> 
> http://www.ee.oulu.fi/~tuukkat/mplayer/tests/x264test3/readme.html
> (warning: embedded eps images)
> 
> At better video quality levels (above 36 dB) and with only one reference
> frame, x264 increases bit rate only 3% compared to JM 9.6. At lower image
> quality, JM has slightly greater advantage, but not much. With two
> reference frames, the difference unfortunately increases, giving x264
> bitrate 5% higher.
> 
> --
> This is the x264-devel mailing-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
> 
> 


-- 
H. Kodikara Arachchi (PhD, MIEEE, MIEE)
Research Fellow
School of Engineering and Design
Brunel University
Kingston Lane
Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH
UK

TP: +44 1 895 266777 (Office), +44 1 895 420669 (Home), +44 78 16688087 
(Mobile)
Email: hemantha at ieee.org, hemantha.kodikara-arachchi at brunel.ac.uk
Fax: +44 1 895 258728 (Office), +1 978 383 3070 (Home)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20050518/e4376503/attachment.htm