[x264-devel] Re: Spam:Re: [PATCH] crosscompilation support

[Gupta, Nitin]

Hi All,
Does anyone have an idea about the latency introduced by the H.264 video codec in x264?
Warm Regards,
Nitin


-----Original Message-----
From: x264-devel-bounce at videolan.org on behalf of Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
Sent: Thu 10/27/2005 10:53 AM
To: x264-devel at videolan.org
Subject: Spam:[x264-devel] Re: [PATCH] crosscompilation support
 
On Thursday, 27. October 2005 18:45, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > As discussed in the last couple of days -- here's a patch that combines
> > the various approaches discussed recently, applies cleanly to svn 342.
>
>    The commonly used flag to set the target architecture is --host,
> maybe you should use it instead of --crosscompile.

I've intentionally used something else so people don't assume "--host is 
there, so I can specify --build and --target as well" ;)

>    By the way, sorry to open the can of worms, but what's the general
> opinion here about the autotools? :-)

I'm not quite an x264 developer (I'm the x264 package maintainer for Ark Linux 
though), but I definitely like the idea -- makes stuff like crosscompiling 
and also like making it both a static and a shared library (when the API is 
ready) much easier.
I'd even volunteer to write the new configure.ac and Makefile.ams unless the 
"real" developers hate the autotools for some reason (there are valid reasons 
to hate them... such as the unreadable files being generated, and the pretty 
steep learning curve of getting configure.acs right.)

LLaP
bero

-- 
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20051027/74dd9cb2/attachment.htm