[x264-devel] Re: x264_me_search_ref

[Johannes Ballé]

Am Montag, 7. August 2006 16:25 schrieb Johannes Ballé:
> lines 209 and 515) I don't understand either why the mv cost is subtracted
> in line 209 nor why it is added in line 515. Could this be related? In line
> 209, it obviously wasn't clear to the author himself. In line 515, m->cost
> should already include mv_cost (because of the way COST_MV_* works), so I
> don't see a reason why it is added there again.

Thinking twice about it, this could be meant as way to account for SKIP mode, 
but why is it only done for h->mb.i_subpel_refine < 3?

-- 
Johannes Ballé
RWTH Aachen University
johannes.balle at rwth-aachen.de

-- 
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html