[x264-devel] AW: Re: AW: Re: Error Concealment
List, Peter
Peter.List at t-systems.com
Wed Jan 17 16:25:42 CET 2007
> To be honest I somehow avoided being the person to implement FMO in
any of
> our projects (maybe I avoided it on purpose ;)), but from what I can
> gather
> from others it isn't as horrible as it first appears. There are two
nasty
> bits that I am aware of:
>
> 1. We write hardware decoders and the amount of expensive on-chip RAM
> required to calculate the availability of macroblock neighbours is
just
> too much to justify for this one task. So this calculation has to be
done in
> software and beforehand and downloaded to the chip, which is a
complexity
> that we don't like.
>
> 2. Without FMO the loop filter can work in the pipeline filtering each
> macroblock as it is decoded and without requiring too much RAM. With
FMO
> this cannot be done and solving this really messes up the design.
> Cheers,
> -Ryan
Thank you for taking the time to explain.
Regards
Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20070117/536dab8d/attachment.htm
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list