[x264-devel] Re: [Griffith Rees <griff.rees at gmail.com>] Re: Re: Problems compiling xubuntu ppc

[Griffith Rees]

Hi, sorry I didn't get back to you sooner, but thanks so very much for
fixing the code. It seems to work fine, though I haven't had a chance to
test it thoroughly. It compiles at least, which is much more than it did
before.

Many, many thanks, and if there is any trivial (as in, someone with some C
programming experience could handle it) grunt work needed altivec wise, or
something I could help with otherwise please let me know.

keep up the good work,

-griff


On 1/25/07, Guillaume POIRIER <poirierg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 1/24/07, Guillaume POIRIER <poirierg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/24/07, Guillaume POIRIER <poirierg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Attached patch fixes all compilation issues on Linux, and pass
> > > regression tests on both Linux and OSX. It needs to be applied on top
> > > of a current, clean svn checkout.
> > >
> > > I won't apply it as it is as I need to find a better solution for the
> > > type of mfv on quant 4x4 dc routine. That cleaner solution should
> > > allow shave off one or two cycles by getting rid of a vec_packs()
> >
> > Ok, here's the latest incarnation, which fixes all know issues.
> >
> > I'll apply it tomorrow unless someone objects. Off course, regression
> > tests do pass on both Linux and OSX.
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Guillaume
>
> --
> This is the x264-devel mailing-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20070128/9dea0f8c/attachment.htm