[x264-devel] H.264/SVC

Alex Giladi alex.giladi at gmail.com
Mon Jul 9 18:36:25 CEST 2007


I agree with the point.
SVC can be good if you have heterogenous clients (i.e. different
bandwidths or/and different display capabilities, etc.).
--a

On 7/9/07, Steven Tondeur <stondeur at etro.vub.ac.be> wrote:
> FGS (fine grain scalability) has been removed from the latest joint
> draft (which is now considered final). What is left is spatial
> scalability, temporal scalability, coarse grain and medium grain
> scalability.
>
> jf massol wrote:
> > Not "release" yet.
> > There are differents kinds of scalability in it :
> > - spatial scalability in order to adapt spatial resolution on the
> > "client-side"
> > - temporal scalability ... temporal...
> > - fine granularity scalability based on enhancement layer ( e.g the
> > client receives a base quality layer, and if the channel allows it or
> > its ressources etc., the client will be able to receive and decode a
> > final stream composed of the base layer + some enhancement layers)
> > - etc.
> >
> > For further informations you should look around this :
> > http://ip.hhi.de/imagecom_G1/savce/index.htm
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
_______________________________________________
x264-devel mailing list
x264-devel at videolan.org
http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel


More information about the x264-devel mailing list