[x264-devel] H.264/SVC

Jean-Michel HAUTBOIS jean-michel.hautbois at crf.canon.fr
Mon Jul 9 09:20:58 CEST 2007


I agree with jf massol, and you really should be careful when telling 
such stupid things, leon jorgunsen Without proofs, please do not deny 
the work of others.

Regards,
Jean-Michel.

jf massol wrote:
> I don't think so. SVC may be really interesting for operators in order 
> to adapt streams from only one. And I guess some providers would use 
> it in the future because of the widely-spread of IPTV.
>
> 2007/7/6, leon jorgunsen <leon.jorgunsen at caramail.com 
> <mailto:leon.jorgunsen at caramail.com>>:
>
>     Like many scalability extensions already specified in previous
>     video standards, this new one won't be deployed by operators.
>     Scalability work in AVC was intended for mpeg video people to
>     justify their job (patents deposit) and to still join mpeg fiestas...
>     Don't waste your time.
>
>     > De: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois at crf.canon.fr
>     <mailto:jean-michel.hautbois at crf.canon.fr>>
>     > A: Mailing list for x264 developers < x264-devel at videolan.org
>     <mailto:x264-devel at videolan.org>>
>     > Objet: Re: [x264-devel] H.264/SVC
>     > Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:02:25 +0200
>
>     > Hi,
>     > Geneva is the "validation meeting", and is not finished yet. It
>     also
>     > speeks about MVC.
>     > So, no, the standard is not out, but the last draft will not
>     move a lot :
>     > JVT-W201 -- <a
>     > href=
>     http://ftp3.itu.ch/av-arch/jvt-site/2007_04_SanJose/JVT-W201.zip>http:/
>     >
>     /ftp3.itu.ch/av-arch/jvt-site/2007_04_SanJose/JVT-W201.zip</a>For
>     those who
>     > want to have a look to what has been said/presented, here
>     > is the link for Geneva :
>     > <a
>     >
>     href=http://ftp3.itu.ch/av-arch/jvt-site/2007_06_Geneva/>http://ftp3.itu.ch/
>     <http://ftp3.itu.ch/>
>     > av-arch/jvt-site/2007_06_Geneva/</a>I think it would be
>     interesting to add
>     > a branch, for x264-svc, as the
>     > AVC base is the same.
>     > Regards.
>     > Jean-Michel.
>     > Guillaume POIRIER wrote:
>     > > Hi,
>     > >
>     > > On 7/5/07, Alex Giladi <alex.giladi at gmail.com
>     <mailto:alex.giladi at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > >
>     > >> Are there any plans on adding H.264/SVC functionality to x264?
>     > >> Thanks.
>     > >> Alex.
>     > >>
>     > >
>     > > Is the standard out yet?
>     > >
>     > > Guillaume
>     > >
>     > >
>     > </pre><pre>_______________________________________________
>     > x264-devel mailing list
>     > x264-devel at videolan.org <mailto:x264-devel at videolan.org>
>     > <a
>     > href=http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>     <http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel>>http://mailman.videolan
>     > .org/listinfo/x264-devel</a>
>
>     www.jubii.fr <http://www.jubii.fr> c'est une seule interface pour
>     communiquer. Email, téléphone gratuit, messagerie instantanée, 10
>     Go d'espace de stockage. Avec www.jubii.fr <http://www.jubii.fr>
>     simplifiez-vous la vie !
>     _______________________________________________
>     x264-devel mailing list
>     x264-devel at videolan.org <mailto:x264-devel at videolan.org>
>     http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>   

_______________________________________________
x264-devel mailing list
x264-devel at videolan.org
http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel


More information about the x264-devel mailing list