[x264-devel] Re: CABAC performance

[Sergey A. Sablin]

yes I know - that's why I wrote "anyone could make a bunch of such tests 
with x264 (without RDO and trellis of course)"
and btw I didn't said this test was made with x264.

Sergey.


Mathieu Monnier wrote:
>> Speed difference is less than 5%. (high quality encoding with rdo 
>> enabled for both cavlc and cabac, but settings aren't insane)
>
> AFAIK, x264 computes RD costs with CABAC, so using RD bias x264 toward 
> CABAC.
>
> Plain SAD / SATD decision ( ie, no trellis, subme 5, no brdo ) would 
> be fairer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mathieu
>

-- 
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html