[x264-devel] recommended settings for screencapture encoding?
Dmitriy Vatolin
dmitriy at graphics.cs.msu.ru
Wed Nov 7 17:24:18 CET 2007
Dear Tonda,
Tuesday, November 6, 2007, 9:17:28 PM, you wrote:
TM> Hi, my personal experience is that *lossless* h264 good for screen
TM> captures, it is much better then lossy h264.
Absolutely! Also any independent comparison of lossless h264
efficiency with MSU Screen Capture Lossless Codec
http://www.compression.ru/video/ls-codec/screen_capture_codec_en.html
will be very interesting. Now the best results for screen capture
content is clamed but external independent comparisons is
necessary.
Yours,
Dmitriy
TM> Maarten de Boer wrote:
>> Hi Loren,
>>
>> Loren Merritt <lorenm at u.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you sure you want to use h264? There are formats designed for screen
>>> capture, which work much better within their domain than a general purpose
>>> video codec does. e.g. ZMBV may be lossless at bitrates where h264 looks
>>> merely ok. (But screen capture codecs are all(?) lossless only, so if you
>>> need to reduce bitrate below what they give, h264 may become useful
>>> again.)
>>>
>>
>> Yes, bitrate, but also availability, are reasons i'd like to use h264. Thanks
>> for the suggestion though!
>>
>> maarten
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> x264-devel mailing list
>> x264-devel at videolan.org
>> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>>
>>
TM> _______________________________________________
TM> x264-devel mailing list
TM> x264-devel at videolan.org
TM> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
TM> __________ NOD32 2430 (20070731) Information __________
TM> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
TM> http://www.eset.com
--
Best regards,
Dmitriy mailto:dmitriy at graphics.cs.msu.ru
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list