[x264-devel] PAFF

[jtwen at ix.netcom.com]

Not necessarily. The MB level adaptivity comes at an extra overhead which can kill you in some cases.

Gene

-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari at gmail.com>
>Sent: Apr 3, 2008 10:59 AM
>To: Mailing list for x264 developers <x264-devel at videolan.org>
>Subject: Re: [x264-devel] PAFF
>
>>  In other hand, if we use
>>  MBAFF (x264 MBAFF implementation for example) the quality of the pictures is
>>  lower than if we use PAFF.
>
>This sound quite questionable.  MBAFF should always be superior to
>PAFF for interlaced sources.
>
>Dark Shikari
>_______________________________________________
>x264-devel mailing list
>x264-devel at videolan.org
>http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel