[x264-devel] I444 support

Alex Giladi alex.giladi at gmail.com
Mon Jan 14 22:56:03 CET 2008


IMHO, it depends what do you use as your symbol.
However, I agree that in many scenarios (especially when delay is less
important and packet loss probability is not too high), retransmission
should be more efficient.

On Jan 14, 2008 1:20 PM, iibot <iibot at gmx.at> wrote:
> Alex Giladi schrieb:
> > Isn't it simpler to use FEC in this case?
>
> Lost packets are quite long burst of failing data from a FEC point of
> view. Retransmit is much more efficient in this case than using a code
> that handles such long bursts.
>
> Tobias
>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>



More information about the x264-devel mailing list